Wednesday, 6 April 2016

On the theme of isolation



“The ones who are a real danger are the self-contained types like you.”

Taking this quote from the film ‘High Rise’ has made me think more about my project and the direction I would like to go in. My fascination with tower blocks, from my early childhood in Warsaw to seeing them looming over horizons wherever I am in London, made ‘High Rise’ seem like the perfect film to push further my ideas. 

However over the past few weeks, while researching the subject, I have felt as if I am going too far down the wrong path. Despite my interest in huge buildings, living conditions, communist-era architecture and so on, I have come to the realisation that I enjoy my work more when it is focused more on the individual. My idea of a future London with tower blocks ringed around the perimeter was meant to show how individuals would live, however I feel the scale of the idea makes these observations less effective, not so personal.

As a result I have taken the step of altering my idea and focus on one person. It will still be a commentary on how people live, and will still be a ‘science fiction’ piece, however I am keen to infuse it with a sense of deadpan absurdity, not unlike the work of Luis Bunuel.

I have taken the concept of a ‘self-contained’ person and am revisiting an idea I had a while ago about a man increasingly cutting himself off from the world but still attempting to live a normal life. It was initially a comment on social media, but having taken the advice of one of my tutors and read Jean Baudrillard essay, ‘The Ecstasy of Communication’, I am enthusiastic about making it into a piece on the tension between how we live and how we would like to live.


 Notes on a narrative of a man who isolates himself 


Scene from Luis Bunuel's 'Exterminating Angel', a film where 
a group of people are unable to leave the drawing room of a house, 
for no apparent reason.


El ángel exterminador (The Exterminating Angel) (1962) Directed by Luis Bunuel [Film]. Mexico:  Producciones Gustavo Alatriste

Tuesday, 5 April 2016

High Rise



Poster to High Rise (2016)

“The ones who are a real danger are the self-contained types like you.”

The protagonist of the film, well to-do brain surgeon Dr. Robert  Laing is given this insight into his character by Richard Wilder, an aptly-named TV documentary maker who inhabits the lowest floors of the high rise, many floors below Laing. Wilder is the impulsive, passionate and angry foil to Laing’s cool, repressed detachment and the two become as close to friends as is allowed in the tense, paranoid atmosphere of the high rise and its unfolding anarchic story.
The accusation highlights the fact that the building, designed to perfection by architect  Anthony Royal who lives in the top-floor penthouse, is not made for people to live together, but for people to live individually, in box-like compartments, separate and distant from the neighbours on all sides.

Royal has his own lavish garden on the roof and his own private lift. Those living on the lower floors have less light coming in through their windows and are the first to suffer a power-cut. There is here a nod to the recent real-life furore surrounding ‘poor doors’, whereby developers of apartment buildings provide separate hidden entrances and services for less wealthy inhabitants. This, together with grudging acquiescence by many developers to provide a legal proportion of ‘affordable’ flats, mirrors the attitude of Royal, who prides himself on his ‘crucible for change’ when in fact he has no interest in the other residents, visiting the lower floors only when an extreme situation calls for it. 

The ‘high rise’ was synonymous with the state provision of housing in the 70s, when JG Ballard wrote the book. He uses it, however, as an ‘extreme metaphor’ for the class system, for the difficulties we face when having to deal with each other. The building is a hot-box which only takes one incident to overheat and bring the people inside into disrepute. Our desire to live as a community, but also to cut ourselves off leads to tension and insecurity, and this in turn brings out our very best (or worst) survival instincts. 

Our narrator Laing is a curious character as he is able to transcend all floors. Royal is comfortable spending time with him, as is Wilder. This may be because he is our protagonist, but it also shows us the character needed to survive. He doesn’t have the hot-headed passion of Wilder or the privileged aloofness of Royal. He realises that to get by he must be both, and neither. He is self-contained, and that is why he survives.




High Rise (2015) Directed by Ben Wheatley [Film]. UK: Recorded Picture Company.


Wednesday, 16 March 2016

The Aftermath Dislocation Principle



Jimmy Cauty, artist and former member of late 80s band KLF, discusses his most recent work, a 1:87 scale model of a dystopian London, where grim tower blocks stand inbetween looted and vandalised fast food outlets and damaged public property. The only people in this scene are police in hi-vis jackets, surveying the scene as if in bewilderment. All trace of what we assume must have been crowds of out-of-control rioters and demonstrators is gone. Only the damage and slogans daubed on walls remains. The scene is made eerie by its realistic medium and by the timing of the scene. The clock stands still as we, the viewers try to imagine what could have happened, and what will happen next.


      Photos: Thomas Mayer



 

Sunday, 13 March 2016

Facades by Zacharie Gaudrillot-Roy


While researching my project, I have returned to familiar photographers and artists as well as discovering new and innovative projects by practitioners whose work either builds on that made by previous artists or investigates something more contemporary.
Work which recently caught my interest is a series called ‘Facades’ by French photographer Zacharie Gaudrillot-Roy. There are three collections; Facades #1, Facades #2, and Facades #3. To me they suggest a confidence in technique as well as a pleasure the photographer takes in building an illusion, which despite knowing it is an illusion, still keeps the viewer very much in the sphere of reality.

The photographs in Facades are of streets, sometimes in urban areas, sometimes in more isolated places in the French countryside, photographed to capture every detail in a careful, considered way, yet some include passers-by to remind us these places are real and not computer-generated. The illusion comes from the fact that all the buildings are stripped of their solid bulk and all that remain are flimsy facades, standing precariously tall, without even the supporting beams you’d expect from a film set.

Facades #1 utilizes various angles, giving us an objective viewpoint in places, as though we are there walking along the street. There is even one photo taken from a high vantage point, with a cityscape in the background, peeking through the gaps where the remains of the buildings should be, adding to the vertiginous effect.

Facades #2 almost takes on a journey, through streets where people walk casually, unaffected by the freestanding facades around them. There are photographs taken in more rural and isolated areas, and I am reminded of Mel Brooks’s film ‘Stir Crazy’, where a group of villagers construct a town entirely from fake fronts of buildings in the middle of the desert as a decoy to a group of cowboys who terrorise them.

The photographs in Facades #3 are all taken at night, and for me another type of magic happens. Night is when our senses are more acute, and familiar places can often seem different, almost as if from another world. Moonlight, streetlamps (they often render colours very differently) and shadows can play tricks on us. I find the photographs in Facades #3 the most convincing.  Like William Gedney’s ‘Houses at Night’, I feel that what I am looking at is unusual, but it is because I am there at an unusual time, and viewing in an unfamiliar atmosphere.

Gaudrillot-Roy’s aim is to highlight the feeling of walking through a place for the first time, where all the information we have to go by are the fronts of buildings. 

‘The façade is the first thing we see, it’s the surface of a building. It can be impressive, superficial or safe.’

‘Just like during a wandering through a foreign city, I walk through the streets with these questions : what will happen if we stick to that first vision? If the daily life of “The Other” was only a scenery?’

Most of us have had the experience of walking around a foreign town or city. Our senses are heightened as we grasp for something familiar, and our curiosity for what lies beyond the surface may be sharper. There is also a slight tension, the possibility of becoming lost, of wandering into unsafe areas, of never finding a way back, or walking into a trap. Gaudrillot-Roy’s photographs and the technique he uses play on these tensions and our feelings of vulnerability. 

That feeling of discovering all is not as it seems, that what we see is a fake, can have a powerful psychological effect, and can often hark back to our childhood and loss of innocence. Certainly dreams formed by anxiety can shape scenarios where familiarity and security are turned on their head. The photographs in Facades do have a dreamlike quality to them, and it is in large part due to the techniques used, where they are manipulated digitally just enough to make them almost believable. The photographer has presented us with the right amount of illusion and inventiveness so that his aim is clear, without drawing attention to the technique used. Like dreams that tell us something, Facades is a series which captures just the right amount of reality for the message to be convincing.

Photography is a medium where lines between reality and fantasy can be very thin, and a technique such as computer manipulation is only one method of finding a place between the two. Studying Gaudrillot-Roy’s series of facades is helping me to determine how to present my work with just the right amount reality and fiction. I am also keen to explore how to seduce the viewer and make them enjoy the experience of viewing a different world through my photographs.
1  





         Stir Crazy (1980) – directed by Mel Brooks 
        
         Houses at Night by William Gedney (1960-73) http://www.americansuburbx.com/2013/06 /william-gedney-houses-at-  night.html

         Hitchcock and Art: Fatal Coincidences by Dominique Paini and Guy Cogeval (Mazzotta   Edizione, 2000)